Fundamentals of legal argumentation : a survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions
Fundamentals of legal argumentation : a survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Jurisprudence. Philosophy and theory of law > Methodology > General works
Edition Details
- Creator or Attribution (Responsibility): E. T. Feteris
- Language: English
- Publication Information: Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, ©1999
- Material: Internet resource
- Type: Book, Internet Resource
- Series title: Argumentation library, v. 1.
- Permalink: https://books.lawin.org/fundamentals-of-legal-argumentation-a-survey-of-theories-on-the-justification-of-judicial-decisions/ (Stable identifier)
Short Description
X, 225 pages ; 25 cm.
Purpose and Intended Audience
Useful for students learning an area of law, Fundamentals of legal argumentation : a survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions is also useful for lawyers seeking to apply the law to issues arising in practice.
Research References
- Providing references to further research sources: Search
More Options
- Find it at other libraries via WorldCat/OCLC
- Find Fundamentals of legal argumentation : a survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions in Google Books
- Find Fundamentals of legal argumentation : a survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions in Open Library
Bibliographic information
- Publisher: Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Responsable Person: by Eveline T. Feteris.
- Number of Editions: 17 editions
- First edition Date: 1999
- Last edition Date: 2007
- Languages: English, Spanish, Chinese
- Library of Congress Code: K212
- ISBN: 0792355849 9780792355847
- OCLC: 40595622
Main Contents
Preface. Introduction. 1. Research Into Legal Argumentation. 2. A Survey of Approaches and Topics. 3. The Logical Approach. 4. Toulmin’s Argumentation Model. 5. Perelman’s New Rhetoric. 6. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Rationality. 7. MacCormick’s Theory of the Justification of Legal Decisions. 8. Alexy’s Procedural Theory of Legal Argumentation. 9. Aarnio’s Theory of the Justification of Legal Interpretations. 10. Peczenik’s Theory of Transformations in the Law. 11. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Legal Argumentation in the Context of a Critical Discussion. 12. Towards a Theory of Legal Argumentaton in the Context of a Critical Discussion. Bibliography. Author Index. Subject Index.
Summary Note
Legal argumentation is a distinctively multidisciplinary field of inquiry. This title offers a comprehensive survey of the various theoretical influences which have informed the study of legal argumentation. It discusses backgrounds to this field as well as various major approaches and trends in the contemporary research.
Table of Contents
Preface. Introduction. 1. Research Into Legal Argumentation. 2. A Survey of Approaches and Topics. 3. The Logical Approach. 4. Toulmin’s Argumentation Model. 5. Perelman’s New Rhetoric. 6. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Rationality. 7. MacCormick’s Theory of the Justification of Legal Decisions. 8. Alexy’s Procedural Theory of Legal Argumentation. 9. Aarnio’s Theory of the Justification of Legal Interpretations. 10. Peczenik’s Theory of Transformations in the Law. 11. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Legal Argumentation in the Context of a Critical Discussion. 12. Towards a Theory of Legal Argumentaton in the Context of a Critical Discussion. Bibliography. Author Index. Subject Index.